> Are these just empty words? Or is it legally enforceable Neither. The purpose of this language isn’t to bind the recipient; it’s to guard against claims that

> Are these just empty words? Or is it legally enforceable Neither. The purpose of this language isn’t to bind the recipient; it’s to guard against claims that the sender waived privilege. > “inadvertent disclosure” of privileged material does not operate as a waiver so long as (i) the privilege holder took “reasonable steps to prevent disclosure”; and (ii) the privilege holder took “reasonable steps to rectify the error.” https://www.americanbar.org/groups/business_law/resources/business-law-today/2017-april/ethics-corner-inadvertent-disclosure-traps-await-the-unwary/ https://www.americanbar.org/groups/business_law/resources/bu...