3 ms·
In an ideal world, we wouldn’t have a tiered education system and that everyone will have access to master any subject/curriculum regardless of age. Therefore,
by lvl102 3y ago
In an ideal world, we wouldn’t have a tiered education system and that everyone will have access to master any subject/curriculum regardless of age. Therefore, we wouldn’t need an arbitrary and flawed aptitude tests.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- germinalphrase 3y agoNo disagreement here.
- BlueFalconHD 3y agoI agree. If a child understands and excels at some topic, they should have the choice to move on to the next? (I believe this is what you mean, correct me if I'm wrong)
- csa 3y ago> In an ideal world, we wouldn’t have a tiered education system and that everyone will have access to master any subject/curriculum regardless of age. I’m not sure where you are, but I’m in the US (specifically California). This dream of yours pretty much exists. > Therefore, we wouldn’t need an arbitrary and flawed aptitude tests. The aptitude tests are more for matching folks who will be more closely matched in terms of quantity and speed of learning. There is definitely some virtue signaling as well via elite admissions, but that doesn’t exclude anyone from learning pretty much most subjects. Maybe I don’t understand what you’re suggesting.