I don't see the article as a troll, but raises a legitimate question about why Mozilla is only targeting Microsoft and not Apple. First of all I think we can a

I don't see the article as a troll, but raises a legitimate question about why Mozilla is only targeting Microsoft and not Apple. First of all I think we can agree that Apple's actions with iOS and Microsoft's actions with Windows RT are exactly equivalent. >The question is "are Microsoft's actions in this case monopolistic? Now because the answer to that question is most likely yes..." How can they be monopolistic when they have zero marketshare in the tablet market and exactly zero apps from their Win32 monopoly will even run on the new platform? If you think the answer is yes, then is Apple guilty of the same? > Let's say Apple is wrong which is the implication here. If that's true then so is Microsoft. Not necessarily, because Apple has a way larger marketshare in the tablet market. Your argument is like claiming in 2000 that it would be an anti-trust issue for Apple to bundle their browser with their computers.