3 ms·
Here's an excerpt from YouTubes Javascript. Do you think this looks maintainable? Z3 = function(a) { a = g.fb(a); delete X3[a]; g.md(X3) && Y3 && Y3.stop()
by SebastianKra 3y ago
Here's an excerpt from YouTubes Javascript. Do you think this looks maintainable?
Z3 = function(a) { a = g.fb(a); delete X3[a]; g.md(X3) && Y3 && Y3.stop() },
...or maybe the build-output isn't a great indicator for maintainability. If you write your html directly like you posted above, it won't be maintainable regardless of how you structure your css.
- darajava 3y agoWhat I posted isn’t build output, it’s the example they give on the homepage of their website.
- scotty79 3y agoThat's super funny that even a defender of tailwind mistook source code for build output.
- SebastianKra 3y agoOkay, if that's how they're selling Tailwind, I can understand why some developers are confused. I assume they do it because they don't want to promote a specific framework on their homepage. Go to the section "Worried about duplication? Don’t be." Does the code there look more maintainable to you? Because that's how you should be writing any moderately complex html anyways.