4 ms·
flash was crappy, had poor compatibility and tons of vulnerabilities but it was replaced with.. nothing. and there is still a gap in that market for novice cre
by serf 3y ago
flash was crappy, had poor compatibility and tons of vulnerabilities
but it was replaced with.. nothing. and there is still a gap in that market for novice creators that all the webgl/html5/toolkit-of-the-week has yet to cater towards.
Jobs interest in bad-mouthing it in the early days had more to do with cutting development costs on his side, if flash and adobe is the devil there is no need to spend time and effort developing compatibility layers for it, and it's a chance to wedge the populous towards a solution he can control more closely.
'vulnerabilities' was just the talking point he used to do so.
- musiccog 3y ago> but it was replaced with.. nothing. and there is still a gap in that market for novice creators that all the webgl/html5/toolkit-of-the-week has yet to cater towards. The reason Flash (and Director before it) was so popular is that it had a very low barrier to entry for creatives. I still miss Director because of how easy it was to quickly create cross platform apps that could do just about anything.