When this question is asked, it's always with an implicit bias that executives are all morally bankrupt demons that would be beaten to death by the public if no

When this question is asked, it's always with an implicit bias that executives are all morally bankrupt demons that would be beaten to death by the public if not for police. My response to that is: we should change the laws. Nobody ever asks this question thinking about multi-generation family businesses where the executive is the head of household and if everything works out, the business will be passed down to their progeny. Of course, it also begs the question why do we accept this?