3 ms·
If you want to test it with multiple languages, perhaps try all the parliaments of the world? They tend to have public recordings.
by Kwpolska 3y ago
If you want to test it with multiple languages, perhaps try all the parliaments of the world? They tend to have public recordings.
- alihaghani 3y agoGreat idea. I imported a Scottish Parliament meeting (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b2WPUzr5ieI https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b2WPUzr5ieI), you can see the results here: https://app.circleback.ai/view/ltg9d70asxk05j1fyaq https://app.circleback.ai/view/ltg9d70asxk05j1fyaq. Right now, speaker identification (and thus everything downstream that depends on that) works better for meetings where Circleback joins the call (compared to those imported) but I wanted to share this anyway.
- wavemode 3y agoThe summary is very high quality! Thanks for that. I think the thing I'd like most is if the AI could "cite" its source (i.e. provide a timestamp of when exactly the statement was made that it's summarizing) directly inline in the summary (vs. only in the transcript). Similarly to how they're used in AI-powered search (e.g. Perplexity), inline citations would help me easily cross-reference statements and gain confidence that the summary is accurate and the information can be relied on.
- geraldhh 3y agoexcellent idea! this could be the litmus test of product fitness