> I didn't expect I'd have to make this point clearer but given the pedantry in HN I wasn't being pedantic. I understood exactly what problem you were pointing

> I didn't expect I'd have to make this point clearer but given the pedantry in HN I wasn't being pedantic. I understood exactly what problem you were pointing at, as I hoped the rest of my comment would make clear (but maybe I was wrong). Spotify needs to survive on 70% of Spotify's revenue, Apple needs to survive on 100% of Apple Music's revenue + 30% of Spotify's revenue. Of course that's unfair. What I was trying to point out with the "it pays 100% to Apple" comment was exactly that you can't "just" say that "Apple Music must also be required to pay 30% of its revenue to the platform owner", for obvious reasons. > [The other stuff] I would certainly not be against splitting up Apple and making the services division its own company which can't get special favors. I just didn't get the impression that that's what you were advocating for, since your comment didn't call for it (hence the (genuine, not rhetorical) question of "how would you achieve fairness without splitting up Apple").