Just reposting another comment here which has a link to their original, mission statement: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39611908 https://news.ycombinat

Just reposting another comment here which has a link to their original, mission statement: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39611908 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39611908 That mission statement contradicts what I’m reading here. It also contradicts what Anthropic is doing. HuggingFace, TogetherAI, and Mosaic are all executing on the original vision which OpenAI has abandoned. Perhaps the board and regulators should ask those companies’ leaders how to best balance open AI’s vs business and risk management. Also, don’t forget it’s not proprietary/closed vs free/open. There are models in between with shared source, remixing, etc. They might require non-commercial use for the models and their derivatives. Alternatively, license the models with royalties on their use like RTIS vendors do. They can build some safety restrictions into those agreements if they want. Like for software licensing, we don’t have to totally abandon revenue to share or remix the code.