> I’m sorry but why do you feel “we’re on it” is directly addressing anything or conveying a clear plan to fix it? I'm not saying it conveys a plan, but rather

> I’m sorry but why do you feel “we’re on it” is directly addressing anything or conveying a clear plan to fix it? I'm not saying it conveys a plan, but rather that it conveys intent and that - coming directly from the CEO - that is significant. Again, compare to most other companies of the size of AMD... would the CEO of the company respond to tweets like that? I'd say "no" in general, and that that is part of why this carries meaningful weight. Clearly the issue is important enough to get the attention of Lisa Su, and important enough for her to respond. That tells me something. YMMV, of course.