> lawyers seem to think that the lawsuit is a badly argued joke, its because it is a badly argued joke. The founding charter is just that, a charter not a cont

> lawyers seem to think that the lawsuit is a badly argued joke, its because it is a badly argued joke. The founding charter is just that, a charter not a contract: > the corporation will seek to open source technology for the public benefit when applicable There are two massive caveats in that statement. wide enough to drive a stadium through. Elon is just pissed, and is throwing lawyers at it in the hopes that they will fold (A lot of cases are settled out of court, because its potentially significantly cheaper, and less risky.) The problem for Musk is that he is fighting with company who also is rich enough to afford good lawyers for a long time. Also, he'll have to argue that he has materially been hurt by this change, again really hard. last of all, its a company, founding agreements are not law, and often rarely contracts.