bullfrogs want wings, so they don't bump they little butts when they hop. I find it interesting that seemingly the same people willing to embrace "When buying

bullfrogs want wings, so they don't bump they little butts when they hop. I find it interesting that seemingly the same people willing to embrace "When buying isn't owning, copying isn't stealing" approaches to Intellectual Property are worried about protecting their IP from AI. Right now "AI" is pretty much "Big Tech / Big Media" bad guys, sure. Anyone suspect that's the way it stays? "Model training is too expensive" so no one will have home built or shared, sharded, federated public model building? Certainly not, if there's no legal way to train without massive involvement in the universe of IP law. Will "publication" come to mean more than "performance" and include some compulsory licensing scheme? Will we need to pin flags to our lapels so that everyone can know the legal status of our every utterance?