3 ms·
There’s no claim to be as easy as javascript to write. Rusts “difficulty” stems from its single ownership model, and this model is “different” not “easier”. h
by wokwokwok 3y ago
There’s no claim to be as easy as javascript to write.
Rusts “difficulty” stems from its single ownership model, and this model is “different” not “easier”.
https://dada-lang.org/docs/dyn_tutorial/permissions https://dada-lang.org/docs/dyn_tutorial/permissions
- rubyfan 3y agoFrom what it looks more expressive and seems intuitive to me.
- DinaCoder99 3y agoI personally find the semantics of javascript a lot harder to internalize than rust due to its scoping and very unintuitive object system. I can't imagine this is any more difficult than that.
- jokethrowaway 3y agoI agree but most modern JS doesn't use prototypal inheritance. JS has plenty of bad parts you shouldn't use. Classes are the main one.
- iopq 3y agoI had a coworker who wrote return { ... } And JS helpfully inserted a semi-colon after return This is a feature you need to know about and you have to go out of your way not to get rekt by it
- DinaCoder99 3y agoEven checking the class of a given object feels quite flimsy to me, although this perhaps isn't a huge problem in a coherent codebase. This isn't meant to be an attack on javascript as a worthwhile tool to learn, by the way, just a testament to the fact that it's not an easy language to master in the slightest.