> But instead of changing their name and their mission, and returning the donations they took from these wealthy tech founders, they used the benevolent appeara

> But instead of changing their name and their mission, and returning the donations they took from these wealthy tech founders, they used the benevolent appearance of their non-profit status and their name to mislead everyone about their intentions. Why would they change their mission? If achieving the mission requires money then they should figure out how to get money. Non-profit doesn't actually mean that the corporation isn't allowed to make profit. Why change the name? They never agreed to open source everything, the stated mission was to make sure AGI benefits all of humanity.