5 ms·
I hate bundled adware as much as the next man here, but we also need to be fair and acknowledge that FileZilla plainly informs the user: "This installer may in
by Dalewyn 3y ago
I hate bundled adware as much as the next man here, but we also need to be fair and acknowledge that FileZilla plainly informs the user:
"This installer may include bundled offers. Check below for more options."
The download page[1] that is referred to by "check below" then gives a list of both installers (without the adware) and ZIP archives, and notably does not list the adware'd installer.
[1]: https://filezilla-project.org/download.php?show_all=1 https://filezilla-project.org/download.php?show_all=1
- mellutussa 3y ago"may include bundled offers" is not the same thing as "this will install adware on your computer." This is incredibly deceptive for FileZilla and excuses like this just add to the embarrassment.
- maccard 3y agoIt's exactly the same thing.
- pacifika 3y agoIncluded discounts versus mining your pc for advertising purposes, ok
- tyingq 3y agoUsing "may" when you know full well it's "will" isn't honest. And I imagine the UI to install the "offers" makes them not really an offering, but a default.
- maccard 3y agoI agree with you, but it being dishonest doesn't make it mean anything different.
- StefanBatory 3y agoMay include bundled offers has different emotional implications to me.
- mellutussa 3y agoAh, I see you're on our team. Well played!
- phone8675309 3y agoNo it's not. If I say I 'may' give you a million dollars it's much different from _actually_ giving you a million dollars.
- CyberDildonics 3y agoIf they're exactly the same thing, why doesn't it say "This will install adware on your computer" ?
- acatton 3y agohttps://www.deceptive.design/types/preselection https://www.deceptive.design/types/preselection
- JeremyNT 3y agoIf the situation were reversed, and the default were clean and the adware was buried under "check below for more options," nobody would do it. The entire point here is to trick or confuse people who aren't paying attention. I don't know why anybody would ever trust software that uses such dark patterns. Yes it's open source, but who has time to audit everything? We have to rely on other signals to determine how trustworthy a project is, and this is a strong negative signal.
- Dalewyn 3y ago[flagged]