2 ms·
On the one had yes, it would be nice to avoid that sort of association-blurring. But on the other, if we're calling ownership over the '-zilla' suffix then a c
by Nursie 3y ago
On the one had yes, it would be nice to avoid that sort of association-blurring.
But on the other, if we're calling ownership over the '-zilla' suffix then a certain giant monster might take precedent.
- bjoli 3y agoAs long as it is not confuseable it is not trademark infringement. You are free to start a Pharmacy named McDonalds, but not Walmart's Pharma.