Sure, any technology can be abused, but email makes abusing it to be the path of least resistance. For example, suppose you need to send an email to only 563 o

Sure, any technology can be abused, but email makes abusing it to be the path of least resistance. For example, suppose you need to send an email to only 563 out of the 1000 people in your department. Are you going to take the names on the department mailing list, filter out the 437 people who don't need to read it, and send it just to the rest? Nobody's going to spend a half an hour doing that. They will just spam the department mailing list, knowing full well that 437 people are going to spend 5 minutes reading it to determine whether its something they need to pay attention to or not. 5 minutes * 437 people = 36 man hours wasted. Thats a man-week of wasted effort, to save you a half hour's worth of work. Is there any penalty for wasting a man-week of effort? No, because nobody will think about it this way---and email makes it the default action to waste everybody else's time. I, too, long for the ante-entshitificational internet, but IMHO, the enshittification of email was the leading wave of the trend....