3 ms·
> It may be anonymous, but its far from being secure. Would you mind clarifying what you're meaning by 'it' and 'secure'? To me, the (in-)security of a particu
by j_s 15y ago
> It may be anonymous, but its far from being secure.
Would you mind clarifying what you're meaning by 'it' and 'secure'? To me, the (in-)security of a particular bitcoin site is orthogonal to the security of Bitcoin as a protocol/currency, though the security of bitcoin sites does have a huge impact on mainstream use.
- darksaga 15y agoSorry, should have been more clear. By "it" I meant the sites where bitcoins are being traded. And yes, seeing these sites getting hacked frequently makes mainstream acceptance a lot harder. Which in turn makes changing the paradigm take a lot longer.