Nothing about "vaccines linked to autism" ever looked bad. It was one study with sample size n=12, widely and firmly discredited, then used as the basis for a h

Nothing about "vaccines linked to autism" ever looked bad. It was one study with sample size n=12, widely and firmly discredited, then used as the basis for a huge epidemic of motivated anti-intellectualism. Whatever the amount of evidence is that is appropriate to build regulations on, it's certainly far, far above that.