4 ms·
As I said, to prevent states, courts and lawmakers from claiming that all other body autonomy rights have to be explicitly listed. It's general language for a r
by throwaway11460 3y ago
As I said, to prevent states, courts and lawmakers from claiming that all other body autonomy rights have to be explicitly listed. It's general language for a reason. The declaration is good as it is, IMHO your suggestion would lead to weakening it.
- flanked-evergl 3y agoSome people who are against abortion do not consider a fetus as part of the mother's body, so this is not unambiguously an issue of bodily autonomy. Should the declaration not at least be amended to state that a fetus is part of a mother's body then?
- throwaway11460 3y agoI don't think it's necessary. Abortion is disconnecting the fetus from the mother - that's definitely related to the bodily autonomy of the mother, regardless of whether the fetus itself is considered part of it or not. I myself am not sure if I consider the fetus a part of the mother or not. There definitely is a point when it is no longer a part of the mother and I don't think it's only at birth. But regardless of the exact transition point, the mother has the right to decide what is connected to her body.