4 ms·
> And they will refuse to work for organizations like yours that continue to hold regressive views on WFH. Which is 100% their right! (But don’t then go on tec
by cj 3y ago
> And they will refuse to work for organizations like yours that continue to hold regressive views on WFH.
Which is 100% their right! (But don’t then go on tech forums complaining about how difficult it is to find a job)
PS. My company is fully remote (and was remote pre-Covid) so I definitely don’t have “regressive” views on WFH. I rejected a candidate recently who said they wanted to work out of a van while driving the US. As a 100% remote company I’m cool with people working from different places occasionally, but at a minimum I want our employees to have a desk. I don’t want to hire someone for $150k who’s working from the back of a van. I might have hired them in 2021, but in 2024 not having a permanent residence to have an office in is a disqualification.
- ulfw 3y agoWhat an arbitrary limitation. So you don't hire on merit or what your candidate is able to deliver. You hire on desk space
- cj 3y agoI 100% acknowledge that there is likely someone out there who is an amazing “10x developer” that works out of a van. But, on average, not having a desk means lower productivity.