Huh? Now I'm quite puzzled. I find both fine to say. I think I make it pretty clear in my comment that dependency use is a per-programmer issue. If you come to

Huh? Now I'm quite puzzled. I find both fine to say. I think I make it pretty clear in my comment that dependency use is a per-programmer issue. If you come to Rust with an unquenchable dependency-lust, then yeah, you'll wind up with a Cargo file that looks like the Chicago phonebook. But - here's the kicker - you can do that with C or C++ too! There's really nothing about Rust that requires or recommends this, is my point. Rust is a generally safer language than C, this much is fairly well established. That alone is an intrinsic advantage. I'm the sort of dev to inline handwritten assembly for a performance boost, so I feel very warmly towards C (which is just assembly in a wig), but for those things where correctness and safety is more important, Rust is simply the better tool.