4 ms·
>Assuming that is true (I'm not buying Wikipedia as a source) The sources are on the Wikipedia page itself. > This kind of undermines your comment, IMHO; it's
by cedws 3y ago
>Assuming that is true (I'm not buying Wikipedia as a source)
The sources are on the Wikipedia page itself.
> This kind of undermines your comment, IMHO; it's a cliche of white racial solidarity and a race competition
Why is it a race competition to point out when white people are at a disadvantage, but justice to point out when black people are at a disadvantage? It seems you have biases of your own.
>Among successful people in Britain, clearly white males have great advantages
That isn't so obvious to me. A vast portion of successful people in London, especially in the finance sector, are not white British. In fact, as a London-based tech worker, I have become completely accustomed to not seeing white British people in high places.
- wolverine876 3y ago> Why is it a race competition to point out when white people are at a disadvantage, but justice to point out when black people are at a disadvantage? It seems you have biases of your own. That's all part of the same old routine, almost out of a script. It's not hard to understand the difference if you want to. It's your business, but if I find myself following someone else's script - I'm human too; I can get caught up in things too - I look carefully at my reading and my reasoning.
- cedws 3y agoCan you be more specific about what script I am following? You also didn't answer my question, you avoided it.