3 ms·
>> Yes, that car dealership absolutely needs to censor its AI model. Still doing it. Nothing about an LLM is "intelligent". ML at best, not ai. As for the res
by zer00eyz 3y ago
>> Yes, that car dealership absolutely needs to censor its AI model.
Still doing it. Nothing about an LLM is "intelligent". ML at best, not ai.
As for the rest of it, defective by design...
When Open AI, google, MS keep fucking up their own implementation what chances does random car dealership have?
That leaves us with LLMs as general purpose, and interesting toys... the censorship then matters.
- simonw 3y agoLLM's may not be "intelligent", but they most certainly classify as "AI" in the way that term has been used since it was first coined in 1956.
- zer00eyz 3y agouhhhh In 1956 they thought they were going to be on the path to AGI in no time. The people who keep propping up LLMs, the thing were talking about, keep mush mouthing about AGI. Candidly, if you system becomes suddenly deterministic when you turn off the random seed, its not even on that path to AGI. And LLM's run on probability and noise... Inference is the most accurate term for what they do and how they work. Its a bad way to pick stocks, gamble, etc... Calling it AI is putting lipstick on the pig.
- fragmede 3y agoWhat is the lipstick and what is the pig? That they were optimistic in 1956 says nothing, other than some people in tech are dreamers. LLMs are a significant step forwards in AI, showing advancements in language processing critical for AGI. Determinism in AI doesn't negate its intelligence potential any more than you saying "ow" multiple times if someone hits you multiple times does. Describing them merely as AI isn’t cosmetic and reflects the fact that this thing can spit out essays like a know-it-all teenager. Computers didn't use to be able to do that.