4 ms·
You can input Mathematica (ahem, Wolfram Language). I suppose yet another use for LLMs: better translation of natural language input into structured Wolfram cal
by rgovostes 3y ago
You can input Mathematica (ahem, Wolfram Language). I suppose yet another use for LLMs: better translation of natural language input into structured Wolfram calculations. Unsurprisingly, they're already advertising "Wolfram GPT" and have added LLMSynthesize[] etc. to Mathematica.
- 7thaccount 3y agoI assume the translation is a bit more rigorous than running through an LLM.
- rgovostes 3y agoWhich is the problem: It is using natural language processing techniques that were state of the art in 2009, but have been completely eclipsed in the past couple of years. The "rigor" tends to be at odds with the fluidity of user input: typos, search query-ese, ambiguity, etc. The challenging problem that Wolfram|Alpha tries to solve is conversion of natural language queries to structured ones. Although I doubt Wolfram's parser has been completely static for a decade, the most recent generation of language models are vastly better at translating natural language queries to structured ones. See also: how terrible Siri is at everything.
- pbronez 3y agoUgh I can’t wait for Apple to roll out Siri II, re-baselined with contemporary LLM tech. So much of Siri’s architecture is exactly what I want… it’s just too dumb.