3 ms·
I'm sorry but I can't help but feel that this is just semantics. Growing up in the 90s, I remember that it felt perfectly apt to me that a chess engine is "Thin
by falcor84 3y ago
I'm sorry but I can't help but feel that this is just semantics. Growing up in the 90s, I remember that it felt perfectly apt to me that a chess engine is "Thinking..." as it does whatever it does to come up with its next move. And I don't recall ever feeling there's an oxymoron in "artificial intelligence".
- awb 3y agoI think the difference is no one was suggesting that the chess engine was actually thinking. Here, when tokens are predicted in sequence developers are suggesting a motive behind the predicted sequence.