I think this guy is a little bit nuts. His premise is almost certainly true (that Greenpeace has become corrupt), but then he goes on to say that CO2 is "invisi

I think this guy is a little bit nuts. His premise is almost certainly true (that Greenpeace has become corrupt), but then he goes on to say that CO2 is "invisible", so we can't possibly "see" its effects, and the same for microplastics... He also references renewable companies getting rich with German "marks" (?), which I don't think exist anymore (since the Euro in 2002).