Wikipedia [0] also has this to say (emphasis mine): According to the Saskatchewan Mustard Development Commission, "Some of the earliest known documentation of

Wikipedia [0] also has this to say (emphasis mine): According to the Saskatchewan Mustard Development Commission, "Some of the earliest known documentation of mustard's use dates back to Sumerian and Sanskrit texts from 3000 BC". This site (which does not give evidence for the claim) is cited for this quote: https://web.archive.org/web/20160325032401/http://www.saskmustard.com/consumer/mustard/index.html https://web.archive.org/web/20160325032401/http://www.saskmu... Perhaps it was a mistake when copying and pasting. Although, I do think it is important to note that it's not important what Wikipedia says. It matters what the sources say & if they are actual scholarly sources (and not just some type of marketing copy)... 0 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mustard_plant#cite_ref-3 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mustard_plant#cite_ref-3