> My claim is that the people complaining the most about what pictures Gemini are generating are part of one side of the US political aisle I believe this to b

> My claim is that the people complaining the most about what pictures Gemini are generating are part of one side of the US political aisle I believe this to be a vast simplification and a lacking perspective, but of course there are countless reasons why a certain political aisle would leverage such stories. > Calling gemini a "disaster" as the article does is too strong of a word given what I have seen with Gemini 1.5 Pro. "completely unacceptable" was a quote from the Google CEO on the topic of image generation. That the performance of Gemini is not the topic is part of that. The story isn't about any performance metrics of LLMs, it is about how it did generate some controversial images. And that is indeed the larger question compared to how well it performs because there are more implications than a good test score.