4 ms·

>Not for those that demand such politicized images, I suppose. But on all other metrics pretty much yes. What other metrics are you justifying on? In previous

>Not for those that demand such politicized images, I suppose. But on all other metrics pretty much yes. What other metrics are you justifying on? In previous comments I detailed my testing of Gemini 1.5 Pro and it shows significant improvement over Gemini 1.0 and Bard. My target is matching the ability of GPT-4 in my personal set of benchmark tests. It isn't there yet but going from 0 tests passed with Bard to 6 tests passed with Gemini 1.5 is a significant improvement in my mind. [0]:https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39565128 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39565128 >I don't get your reference to elections at all, it doesn't seem to make sense in context of your first question. My claim is that the people complaining the most about what pictures Gemini are generating are part of one side of the US political aisle that is focusing on the content of these images and not any sort of technical improvements or failings. I am led to believe they are a loud minority based on their election performance over the last seven years. Calling gemini a "disaster" as the article does is too strong of a word given what I have seen with Gemini 1.5 Pro.

raxxorraxor 3y ago
> My claim is that the people complaining the most about what pictures Gemini are generating are part of one side of the US political aisle I believe this to be a vast simplification and a lacking perspective, but of course there are countless reasons why a certain political aisle would leverage such stories. > Calling gemini a "disaster" as the article does is too strong of a word given what I have seen with Gemini 1.5 Pro. "completely unacceptable" was a quote from the Google CEO on the topic of image generation. That the performance of Gemini is not the topic is part of that. The story isn't about any performance metrics of LLMs, it is about how it did generate some controversial images. And that is indeed the larger question compared to how well it performs because there are more implications than a good test score.

raxxorraxor 3y ago

> My claim is that the people complaining the most about what pictures Gemini are generating are part of one side of the US political aisle I believe this to be a vast simplification and a lacking perspective, but of course there are countless reasons why a certain political aisle would leverage such stories. > Calling gemini a "disaster" as the article does is too strong of a word given what I have seen with Gemini 1.5 Pro. "completely unacceptable" was a quote from the Google CEO on the topic of image generation. That the performance of Gemini is not the topic is part of that. The story isn't about any performance metrics of LLMs, it is about how it did generate some controversial images. And that is indeed the larger question compared to how well it performs because there are more implications than a good test score.