3 ms·
Essentially, your pricing indicates that you offer only the crippled version of the application unless the individual or small group obtains the $199.99 per mon
by redtexture 14y ago
Essentially, your pricing indicates that you offer only the crippled version of the application unless the individual or small group obtains the $199.99 per month account.
The pricing and usage limitations on forms for "personal" (one user / 10 forms / $19.95/month) and "lite" (20 users, 10 Forms, $99.99/month) indicate that you don't understand that full collaboration for both large and small entities is where you will find and grow your market of users, and that small groups are not going to be thrilled with crippled functionality.
I suggest charging only on a per-user basis and not cripple the application with limited forms. Make it easy for even small users to want to rely on the full application for all of their activity. They will tell everybody about your useful application, and won't advertise its silly crippled limitation. Let both small organizations and individuals grow into comprehensive and full usage without a big hurdle ($200 a month) for complete functionality.
- wilgertict 14y agoWhat redtexture says: all my clients would need the $199/month package because they are collaborating with multiple people (otherwis they could be using Excel with a lot less trouble). But for $2400 a year it's not that much of a cost saving anymore. Please offer "more reasonable" pricing plans.
- gruseom 14y agothey are collaborating with multiple people (otherwise they could be using Excel with a lot less trouble). What's insufficient about Google Docs for that? i.e. a spreadsheet that supports collaborative use.