3 ms·
> I implied nothing of the sort. You're right, you outright stated it, instead of implying it: > On the other side you argue for no restrictions, typically un
by baseballdork 3y ago
> I implied nothing of the sort.
You're right, you outright stated it, instead of implying it:
> On the other side you argue for no restrictions, typically until the day before birth.
> Please, show me where a major Democratic party discussion has taken place where they drew a line. I've shown you one already.
I'm not sure what this is supposed to mean. You just provided a link to a bbc article where the democrats draw a line.
- freedomben 3y ago> You're right, you outright stated it, instead of implying it: >> On the other side you argue for no restrictions, typically until the day before birth. Thank you, fair enough. I didn't intend for the language to be that harsh/hyperbolic, but reading it again as you pointed out it certainly did come out that way. I withdraw the statement. My anecdotal experience discussing this has mostly been as I said, but that cannot be fairly extrapolated and applied so broadly. (I would still standby that IME there are plenty of extremists on both sides in the US though. Though there's probably some selection bias at play here because the extremists are probably more likely to discuss it in the first place)