5 ms·
ChatGPT even with the best prompts is, in general, not great at coding. Being able to pass leet code isn't a threat to software developers. "You'll never code
by jasonjmcghee 3y ago
ChatGPT even with the best prompts is, in general, not great at coding.
Being able to pass leet code isn't a threat to software developers.
"You'll never code as well as ChatGPT" is just not true.
It has next to no idea what it's doing, and this is very clear if you're experienced in software.
It's useful as all hell, as a tool. But the original statement is wholly untrue.
- gravity2060 3y agoSo true. Yet, right now it’s the worst it will ever be.
- almatabata 3y agoThere is the threat of model collapse though as discussed in this paper: https://browse.arxiv.org/pdf/2305.17493v2.pdf https://browse.arxiv.org/pdf/2305.17493v2.pdf? They discuss that if you train models with the output of other models you can get worse results. If we all start using code from those models how will that impact GPT-5?
- MacsHeadroom 3y agoThis paper is a joke in the ML community. Model collapse is not real. This paper made some seriously faulty assumptions in their contrived lab experiment. State of the art models are trained entirely or largely on "synthetic" generated datasets to surpass models trained on purely human data in quality and capability. Even training on uncurated synthetic generated data, from web scrapes after the advent of genersgofe AI, actually leads to more capabilities and quality in models in practice (the exact opposite of what is prediction by the failed model collapse paper).