2 ms·
> WAF based approach is an admission of ignorance and a position of weakness Sure, but what about the benefits? Let's say you've got an ecommerce website, and
by michaelt 3y ago
> WAF based approach is an admission of ignorance and a position of weakness
Sure, but what about the benefits?
Let's say you've got an ecommerce website, and you find XSS.
Without a WAF that would be a critical problem, fixing the problem would be an urgent issue, and it'd probably be a sign you need to train your people better and perform thorough security code reviews. You'll have to have an 'incident wash-up' and you might even have to notify customers.
If you've got a WAF, though? It's not exploitable. Give yourself a pat on the back for having 'multiple layers of protection'. The problem is now 'technical debt' and you can chuck a ticket at the bottom of the backlog and delete it 6 months later while 'cleaning up the backlog'.
/s
- beardedwizard 3y agoit is totally fair to say that a position of weakness is still defensible - I agree. But it should be a choice, for some it doesn't make sense to invest in strength (ie more bespoke or integrated solutions)