4 ms·
>> On the other side you argue for no restrictions, typically until the day before birth. >> The Democrat who sponsored the measure said it would allow abortio
by jgwil2 3y ago
>> On the other side you argue for no restrictions, typically until the day before birth.
>> The Democrat who sponsored the measure said it would allow abortions at any point in pregnancy up until the point of childbirth in certain cases.
The phrase "in certain cases" clearly implies that there are, in fact, restrictions, so you're just wrong to go on the example you've provided. Further, you've said this position is "typical" and yet you only provided one example that doesn't even appear to actually support your claim.
- freedomben 3y agoI'll rollback my use of the word "typical" somewhat, but it is something I see commonly among people who are strongly/ideologically associated with the Democrat Party or consider themselves "very progressive." And the example I provided was a proposed law, not just some random internet comment. If it was a proposed law, does it really seem unlikely that people would argue for it and/or believe it? Remember, the original context of this discussion is regarding uniformity of beliefs between people in Europe vs. people in the US