3 ms·
It is already prohibited on copyright grounds. They put the extra clause to "close" some of the reverse engineering provisions not covered.
by AstralStorm 3y ago
It is already prohibited on copyright grounds. They put the extra clause to "close" some of the reverse engineering provisions not covered.
- loup-vaillant 3y agoCopyright grounds? Copying stuff can violate copyright, but documenting stuff? No no no, you'd need a specific law to prevent disclosing of information. Maybe misappropriation of trade secrets?
- mech422 3y agoI thought in the EU, reversing is (was?) expressly allowed for 'interoperability' - so if someone in EU reversed something and published it...others could then use it as it was 'public knowlege' ?
- justinclift 3y ago> It is already prohibited on copyright grounds. What makes you think that?