The concept that you can sell for X, and X is large and you get nothing shouldn't be a surprise in itself. Investors wouldn't make money if they made every foun

The concept that you can sell for X, and X is large and you get nothing shouldn't be a surprise in itself. Investors wouldn't make money if they made every founder rich regardless of the risk they take. That said, in this case sounds like the founders were f'd over. Why did they accept those terms, why didn't a lawyer or advocate advise against it?