4 ms·
I still remember hearing and myself promoting the concept of "idle computing capacity" in the 1990s (because of the idea that computers would consume the same r
by schoen 3y ago
I still remember hearing and myself promoting the concept of "idle computing capacity" in the 1990s (because of the idea that computers would consume the same resources whether or not they were actively running jobs).
https://hbr.org/2001/03/harnessing-the-power-of-idle-computers https://hbr.org/2001/03/harnessing-the-power-of-idle-compute...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributed.net https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributed.net
For a while I was in charge of the EFF Cooperating Computing Award. When it was announced, the announcement said
> However, the computer industry produces millions of new computers each year, which sit idle much of the time, running screen savers or waiting for the user to do something. EFF is encouraging people to pool their computing power over the Internet, to work together to share this massive resource.
That was in the 1990s. :-)
It's funny to think of just how inaccurate this became for subsequent CPU and chipset architecture, I guess because of convergent trends in customers wanting to save power for ecological, financial, and mobile device battery life reasons.
- narnarpapadaddy 3y agoI enjoyed this self-aware and reflective insight. Thanks for sharing.
- actionfromafar 3y agoYeah, it was so weird when CPUs started sprouting first heat sinks, then fans over the heat sinks. :-)
- simne 3y ago> how inaccurate this became for subsequent CPU and chipset architecture You are right. My previous computer was AMD Athlon, and even it near halved consumption when idle. Modern machines extremely power saving, because desktop CPUs shared many features from Notebook platforms (for example speed step frequency change), and I see more than 6x difference of consumption of whole machine, even when I myself too conservative to use sleep/idle modes, because some programs don't behave adequate in such environment.