From what I can see X is arguing that because they allowed previously banned hate content back onto the site by changing the terms and conditions, the CCDH repo

From what I can see X is arguing that because they allowed previously banned hate content back onto the site by changing the terms and conditions, the CCDH reports were done to intentionally harm the company. CCDH has been operating on X since 2019 in basically the same capacity as they do now so X is trying to argue that in 2019 CCDH started its work knowing it would hurt X financially in the future if changes were made to the terms and conditions. Basically it doesn't make sense and is hard to follow because the argument doesn't make sense in the first place. X seems to to trying to say "TECHNICALLY, Your Honor..." and the judge isn't having it.