3 ms·
In other news, Business Week is two years behind. Also, what's the deal with the fake-vintage effect on the pictures? Is it their lame corporate way of attempt
by nnnnni 14y ago
In other news, Business Week is two years behind.
Also, what's the deal with the fake-vintage effect on the pictures? Is it their lame corporate way of attempting to be "hip"?
- sp332 14y agoIt's not fake vintage, it's neo-nostalgia. It's not pretending to be old, it's inviting the user to feel old-timey.
- dnsco 14y agoActually the Vintage effect isn't fake, the photographer only used vintage film cameras.
- Alex3917 14y agoIt's called Lomography. It's basically a trend that involves shooting photographs using old soviet cameras and expired soviet film: https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=lomography&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_cp.r_qf.,cf.osb&ix=uca&biw=1530&bih=856&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbm=isch&source=og&sa=N&tab=wi&ei=1VCtT-ucOYqZ6QHyid2dDQ https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=lomography&bav...
- grippi 14y agoour photographer (aimee) is actually a fashion photographer by trade and would refuse to use digital during the shoot. give her some love for being awesome! http://www.aimeebrodeur.com http://www.aimeebrodeur.com #tragicallyhip.
- Drbble 14y agoIt captures the awkward expensive less functional nature of the product.