4 ms·

Likewise, it is hard for me to understand how people think your argument makes sense.. I work in ML, although not LLM, and I do understand how they work. I don'

Likewise, it is hard for me to understand how people think your argument makes sense.. I work in ML, although not LLM, and I do understand how they work. I don't think you can reduce LLMs to obfuscating copy-pasters. I believe they are closer to our internalizing process and they can come up with novel solutions to never seen before problems.

palata 3y ago
> Likewise, it is hard for me to understand how people think your argument makes sense.. My argument is "LLMs are not humans, therefore we should be careful with such comparisons". Do you also think that LLMs should have rights? Should it be illegal to make an LLM work 24h a day? > I work in ML, although not LLM, and I do understand how they work. I never meant to underestimate ML. However it feels like you underestimate humans :-). > I don't think you can reduce LLMs to obfuscating copy-pasters. I believe they are closer to our internalizing process Wow. If you think that LLMs are closer to humans than to copy-pasters... you must not think much of living organisms. Now I understand why ML people think that AGI is coming soon :).