2 ms·
Isn't not having perfect support with Apache is, in a way, a criticism of any non-JVM language? Perhaps the problem is on the other end? We need a couple more
by neonsunset 3y ago
Isn't not having perfect support with Apache is, in a way, a criticism of any non-JVM language? Perhaps the problem is on the other end?
We need a couple more Apache Struts and Log4J incidents for the public to realize there may be better technologies and ecosystems. Spring is very slow anyways.
As for Pulsar, there is a nice and optimized client (written in F#!) https://github.com/fsprojects/pulsar-client-dotnet https://github.com/fsprojects/pulsar-client-dotnet
- pjmlp 3y agoWhich .NET Foundation was supposed to solve, yet we observe more and more FOSS projects not happy with it, and moving away from it. Avalonia being the most recent example.
- neonsunset 3y agoHow does that relate to Apache projects being somewhere between Java-centric and Java-exclusive depending on the feature? If anything, we need more decentralization, there are awesome products like NATS that offer rich and well-written client libraries in multitude of languages. More of that.
- pjmlp 3y agoOracle, IBM, Sun on its days, didn't set the tune of the music at Apache, as apparently Microsoft does at .NET Foundation, as per complaints of the projects that decided to withdraw from the Foundation.