4 ms·
I'm all for the US space program returning to the Moon and the NASA public-private approach seems fairly reasonable. It is very odd however to see no mention o
by photochemsyn 3y ago
I'm all for the US space program returning to the Moon and the NASA public-private approach seems fairly reasonable.
It is very odd however to see no mention of the fact that China is about a decade ahead, having completed the Chang'e 3, 4 and 5 missions. which included a successful return of Moon rocks to the Earth. Two more missions are in the works.
The article mentions a Japanese effort, but the omission of China's successes seems fairly deliberate. I wonder what the motivation was?
https://www.space.com/china-new-moon-rover-change-7-mission https://www.space.com/china-new-moon-rover-change-7-mission
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- HarHarVeryFunny 3y agoThe USSR also had successful robotic sample return missions, and rovers, in the 1970s.
- ThisIsMyAltAcct 3y agoBecause the article is about recent difficulties landing on the moon and China has not had recent difficulties landing on the moon?
- anigbrowl 3y agoSeems like it would be worth looking at their approach to provide additional context, doesn't it?
- ThisIsMyAltAcct 3y agoNot really for this article, no.