5 ms·
>violence (banishment) Are we redefining words to fit our agenda now? Edit: Downvoting is violence. :-)
by pb7 3y ago
>violence (banishment)
Are we redefining words to fit our agenda now?
Edit: Downvoting is violence. :-)
- dns_snek 3y agoParent comment used the same word to describe fines levied against Apple. It's an analogy, I was just using it in kind. Nobody is threatening Apple with violence either, merely fines.
- pb7 3y agoParent comment used “monopoly on violence” correctly: the government can physically show up to your house and forcibly imprison you or even kill you if you resist hard enough. No one else can (legally).
- dns_snek 3y agoThat's great, but it doesn't apply to this situation in a literal sense, so I interpreted it figuratively. If you're going to police the figurative use of words, why don't you go after the parent poster for describing the situation as "barbaric"? Our (mostly) democratically elected leaders and regulators are protecting the EU citizens by imposing fines on misbehaving organizations. That's unquestionably civilized behavior.
- basil-rash 3y agoWhat do you think happens if the fines aren’t paid? Fines only work because if the implicit threat of violence behind them if the finor is not paid.
- ambichook 3y agoif the fines arent paid, then apple as a corporation cannot operate in the EU (is banished) there arent going to be EU hit squads rocking up to punch apple executives for not paying fines
- basil-rash 3y agoYou say “cannot”, what does that mean? If they try, who will stop them, and by what means. My guess is they’ll be forcibly imprisoned, and if they resist there is very likely going to be a violent engagement between them and the State.
- dns_snek 3y agoWhat happens? They garnish your wages or corporate bank accounts. By participating in society, you agree to follow the law, with prescribed penalties for breaking it. If you don't wish to participate in society, then you're free to leave, peacefully. I've yet to witness or hear about anyone facing violence over an unpaid fine in real life.
- basil-rash 3y agoThe argument being: “they aren’t being violent, they’re just threatening to rob me of everything I have unless I comply with their demands”? I’d prefer the roughing up scenario.
- mjburgess 3y agoIt's not entirely clear why the power to destroy livelihoods, obtained by monopolistic network effects (ie., racketeering) is substantially different in kind than the power to fine and imprison. In that, many developers would gladly take a week in prison and a fine, over being banned from the app store; which is, in large effect, banning them from using their (developed, life-time specialised) labour effectively within an economy. It's weirdness of the rightwing american mentality, especially, that the potential collective physical aggression of the state has a special status in one's oppression (presumably the civil war, etc. plays a large part here). Since europe's civil wars are long-gone, the most relevant sort of oppression, for most people, is economic and metered out largely by monopolists.