4 ms·
Hi, developper of Lasso from Entr'ouvert here (sorry for the english, I'm more used to talk about programming than french law): It took so much time for many r
by bdauvergne 3y ago
Hi, developper of Lasso from Entr'ouvert here (sorry for the english, I'm more used to talk about programming than french law):
It took so much time for many reasons :
* first the judge advised us to try to mitigate, mitigation failed because Orange/FranceTelecom did not want to mitigate anything (we asked in mitigation for nearly what we won in the end),
* we returned in tribunal, and the judge asked for an expertise to see if really the fact that Orange linked their program with Lasso inside an Apache module was violating GPLv2,
* we lost on first instance,
* we made appeal and won but not on the counterfeiting accusation, only on some other kind of violation in French named "parasitism", the fact is french juridication doctrine on "licences" was that is was a contract, and only a contract and the could only invoke civil contract law and not use counterfeiting laws,
* we did not agree with that, and neither did the european justice court, so we asked the french equivalent of the 2nd circuit (Cours de cassation) to overrule the court of appeal doctrine,
* we won in the cours de cassation,
* so we returned to the appeal court and we won.
And here we are.
The inefficiency come from many aspects :
* french judiciary lacks money and resources, it's not new, everything is slow, budget of ministry of justice by citizen, is half or one third of the same budget is germany, but for specialized justice like counterfeiting of software, it's a special court, which should be faster than for usual civil law,
* BUT france is not California, litigation about software licences and especially free software licence is extremely rare, and usually between commercial entities which have real contractual obligation between them, so that the court can concentrate on the commercial aspect (you owed so much, you had to deliver this and did not, etc...) here we did not have any commercial relation with Orange on this project (we had a long time ago on other project not related to the one for which they used Lasso)
* ALSO france has very special doctrine called (in french) "non cumul de la responsabilité contractuelle et délictuelle", it means that if there is some kind of contract between you and a third party, that imposed them to not violate some law which can also be an offense/crime, the invoked responsibility can only coming from the contract and not from the offense/crime law (counterfeiting is an offense in France), so we had to break this doctrine in "Cours de cassation" before being authorized to litigate on counterfeiting.
- metafunctor 3y agoSo Orange won 12 years time to pay whatever you won in the end? That's a factor of about 2.2x, assuming 7% capital gains year-on-year. If the sums are large, it would've made a lot of sense for Orange to delay the decision for 12 years until having to pay. But I'm not sure at all of the sums here were that substantial.
- sofixa 3y ago> That's a factor of about 2.2x, assuming 7% capital gains year-on-year. Why would you assume 7% year on year? Did you look into Orange's stock price or quarterly/yearly reports, or did you think all companies have the same return as investing in the S&P500 would have? https://www.boursorama.com/cours/1rPORA/ https://www.boursorama.com/cours/1rPORA/ e.g. over 10 years, their stock price is roughly the same as it was back then after a few years slightly higher.
- Matheus28 3y agoThat stock pays dividends of about 7.07% a year it seems
- codethief 3y ago7% is (roughly) what you can make by investing in ETFs tracking some "world market" index like MSCI World, FTSE All World, et cetera, averaged over long periods.
- sofixa 3y agoAnd most companies' business model isn't investing in ETFs. They usually try to do stuff that provides some value to someone, and some perform better, some perform worse than "world market" ETFs.
- brlewis 3y agoIsn't that assuming that Orange's legal costs would have been the same whether or not they settled?
- 3y ago