3 ms·
All while Pichai rakes in $260M/yr for running Google into the ground and failing to retain top talent. As a Xoogler, I know for a fact most googlers wouldn’t b
by ein0p 3y ago
All while Pichai rakes in $260M/yr for running Google into the ground and failing to retain top talent. As a Xoogler, I know for a fact most googlers wouldn’t be too miffed about slightly lower raise every once in a while, but not when the CEO and SVPs avail themselves of such lavish, and ever increasing, compensation packages
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- euroderf 3y agoI'll take a WAG that one cause of these pay patterns is the infiltration of the MBA self-congratulation mentality into the ranks.
- ein0p 3y agoThat and Google’s incredibly deep hierarchical structure. Nowhere else have I seen VPs report to VPs and directors report to directors. At Google this is quite common, and not just now - it was quite common under Schmidt and Page, too. It’s never clear what those people do, and by the time information filters up to the CEO (who, let me remind you, can’t tell a tensor from a hole in the ground) everything is hunky dory. Previously the CEOs were technical and much harder to bullshit. Sundar isn’t technical. He truly is the Ballmer of Google, probably setting the stage for someone else.