4 ms·
I've used both, a 4k 24" display ("once you used retina you can't go back") and a 144Hz display, and I can't be arsed to upgrade my main setup which is three ol
by iforgotpassword 3y ago
I've used both, a 4k 24" display ("once you used retina you can't go back") and a 144Hz display, and I can't be arsed to upgrade my main setup which is three old 24" 1920x1200 screens at 60Hz. Some people really don't care. Heck I don't get those discussions about input latency and terminal emulator holy wars, I can't tell the difference between working on a framebuffer console and working via ssh with an additional 50ms.
I can tell the difference between a 30 and 60fps game, but only if I pay attention to it. As long as it's steady and not bouncing between the two I just don't care.
- Avamander 3y agoI can tell the difference in basically all use-cases instantly. The first window I drag on the desktop or camera I pan in game and it's very noticeable. I find higher fps causes significantly less eye strain in my experience. Microstutters also really annoy me. But it's too much to ask for if a lot of things still force 30fps scroll on me (for example AMD's own Radeon software).