4 ms·
You've got the timeline wrong: the article makes it clear that the samples were sent before Smashmallow signed the deal. > Hoj went to the Netherlands to see t
by resolutebat 3y ago
You've got the timeline wrong: the article makes it clear that the samples were sent before Smashmallow signed the deal.
> Hoj went to the Netherlands to see the Tanis facilities. The company even mailed samples of marshmallows it had produced to Smashmallow's specs. [...] Sebastiani agreed to buy a brand-new system from Tanis for $3 million.
Tanis was sued and lost for not upholding their end of the bargain: a marshmallow production line that actually worked.
- throwup238 3y ago> the samples were sent before Smashmallow signed the deal. Yes. Samples that Tanis claimed were made by automatic machinery which is why Smashmallow signed the deal. That's what made it fraud. That's exactly the timeline I'm talking about. I really don't understand what you're arguing...