3 ms·

In addition, for U.S.A. defense contracting, preference is given to veterans, e.g. "veteran owned", so similar arrangements are made to have affiliations in pla

In addition, for U.S.A. defense contracting, preference is given to veterans, e.g. "veteran owned", so similar arrangements are made to have affiliations in place, or "owners" established. Another place you might see this is cannabis dispensary licenses being preferenced towards those who've been jailed for cannabis-related crimes. In all the cases, it's likely someone who historically hasn't been paid well, so I personally don't care, since it seems to me like the preference is achieving its desired effect in the end (said person getting paid).

standapart 3y ago
Weirdly, they don't preference contracts for shell corps owned by, say, poor white trash from Middletown, Ohio -- despite these people meeting your definition of "someone who historically hasn't been paid well". But I digress. In the biz, if the contract has to be trafficked through a shell corp where the owner takes a 20% cut, everyone simply bids a 20% higher rate. It's the taxpayer's prerogative if they would rather their government pay an inflated contracting rate -- as opposed to using that money for education, infrastructure, social services, etc.
lotsofpulp 3y ago
> since it seems to me like the preference is achieving its desired effect in the end (said person getting paid). The desired effect is stratify the populace into more and more tribes that can fight amongst themselves. You give special treatment to some, thereby weakening political opposition and obtaining plausible deniability to say that you helped. If you want to help someone who hasn’t been paid well historically, then you pull up the database of tax filings, sort from lowest to highest and deposit some money, or give them access to education, or blah blah. “Historically not paid well” has nothing to do with skin tone, religion, gender, or anything other than history of income.
singleshot_ 3y ago
Veteran, woman, or minority owned, more specifically. The US Department of Commerce’s minority business development agency can provide more information about the “8a” program.

standapart 3y ago

Weirdly, they don't preference contracts for shell corps owned by, say, poor white trash from Middletown, Ohio -- despite these people meeting your definition of "someone who historically hasn't been paid well". But I digress. In the biz, if the contract has to be trafficked through a shell corp where the owner takes a 20% cut, everyone simply bids a 20% higher rate. It's the taxpayer's prerogative if they would rather their government pay an inflated contracting rate -- as opposed to using that money for education, infrastructure, social services, etc.

lotsofpulp 3y ago

> since it seems to me like the preference is achieving its desired effect in the end (said person getting paid). The desired effect is stratify the populace into more and more tribes that can fight amongst themselves. You give special treatment to some, thereby weakening political opposition and obtaining plausible deniability to say that you helped. If you want to help someone who hasn’t been paid well historically, then you pull up the database of tax filings, sort from lowest to highest and deposit some money, or give them access to education, or blah blah. “Historically not paid well” has nothing to do with skin tone, religion, gender, or anything other than history of income.

singleshot_ 3y ago

Veteran, woman, or minority owned, more specifically. The US Department of Commerce’s minority business development agency can provide more information about the “8a” program.