So are you defining intelligence by what humans can do? Meaning intelligence is pegged against what we evolved for so anything deviating from that is unintellig

So are you defining intelligence by what humans can do? Meaning intelligence is pegged against what we evolved for so anything deviating from that is unintelligent by definition? If so, I can't really argue with that since its purely semantics. I don't know the point of defining intelligence there at that point though, and it risks diverting the moral and ethical concerns of AI development by falling into a semantic debate. We could make a new word for non-human intelligence, but what does that solve?